Gentlemen. You can't fight in here. This is an AI strategy meeting.

A fast command centre. Merkin, you can't staple two contradictory ideas together and call it consensus. We need a proper AI safety protocol — evaluation, monitoring, human review on critical decisions.

Human review? You want humans slowing down machines? That's like putting a speed limit on a fighter jet. The POINT of AI is removing bottlenecks.

Now Buck, even I keep a hand on the reins. Let a horse run wild and you end up in a ravine. My team does check outputs. Well, MOST of them. The important ones.

Thank you, Kong. That's the first sensible thing anyone has said. Even minimal review prevents catastrophic errors. Can we at least agree on that?

I agree completely! And I think Buck probably agrees too, deep down. Don't you, Buck? We're really close to alignment here. This is productive.

I don't agree. But I'll accept a review layer IF it operates at machine speed. No committees, no sign-off chains. Automated monitoring with human override only when thresholds are breached.