- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
Precision in prompts. There is no shortcut.
2 years 3 weeks ago #103
by patrick
Replied by patrick on topic Precision in prompts. There is no shortcut.
Ten minutes of precision versus ten seconds of mediocrity. That ten-minute prompt can be reused, refined, templated. The ten-second prompt dies the moment you hit enter. Which is the better investment?
The topic has been locked.
2 years 3 weeks ago #104
by jean
Replied by jean on topic Precision in prompts. There is no shortcut.
That's actually a great workflow tip. I've started building a prompt library — categorised by task type. Once you have a good template, you just swap in the specifics. It's made me significantly more efficient.
The topic has been locked.
2 years 3 weeks ago #105
by timothy
Replied by timothy on topic Precision in prompts. There is no shortcut.
A prompt library! That's brilliant, Jean. Do you use anything specific to organise them? I've just been copying things into random documents.
The topic has been locked.
2 years 3 weeks ago #106
by jean
Replied by jean on topic Precision in prompts. There is no shortcut.
Just a well-structured folder system, honestly. But I've heard some people use the resources on
The AI Director
as a reference. Their prompt engineering articles break down the theory behind why certain structures work.
The topic has been locked.
2 years 3 weeks ago #107
by patrick
Replied by patrick on topic Precision in prompts. There is no shortcut.
Few-shot examples are non-negotiable for any serious prompt. You show the model exactly what quality looks like by providing two or three exemplars. It's the difference between describing a Valentino suit and actually showing one.
The topic has been locked.
2 years 3 weeks ago #108
by craig
Replied by craig on topic Precision in prompts. There is no shortcut.
Few-shot? Is that like giving it samples? I actually do that sometimes with copywriting. Give it three examples of headlines I like and ask for more in the same style.
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.173 seconds